11 January 2026

"The Most Underrated Chess Opening for Black Against 1.e4" by Remote Chess Academy

 


I recently looked at the 15-minute video "The Most Underrated Chess Opening for Black Against 1.e4" by the Remote Chess Academy (GM Igor Smirnov). The subtitle is "Opening Crash Course: Caro-Kann Defense", which is what I have played my entire tournament chess career (see "Why I Play the Caro-Kann"). Here is my take on it, from an experienced if not expert player.

Smirnov does a good job of describing the basic ideas and trade-offs behind the first two opening moves, including key points such as defensively blocking the a2-g8 diagonal (for a White Bc4, for example) and how the c6 pawn takes away the Nb8's natural square. After 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5, White reaches a "crossroads" since the e-pawn is attacked, so must make a committal decision - advance it, trade it, or protect it.

  • The first one presented is the Advance Variation, probably the main line these days. White gains space with the pawn push 3. e5. Unsurprisingly for a short video, he recommends 3...c5 for Black, given the different complexities of all the White variations after 3...Bf5, calling it the best option below master level. The goal with 3...c5 is to obtain a better version of the French Advance, with the light-square bishop outside the pawn chain. Smirnov does a good job of covering the ideas behind standard minor piece and queen placements, although the most critical White lines with taking on c5 - effectively accepting Black's gambit - are not treated.
  • The next one is the Exchange Variation, which is always popular at the club level. Smirnov points out that White has solved Black's problem with the c6 square, which is now open for the knight. Natural development for both sides is good, with Black refraining from playing ...e6 before the bishop goes to g4.
  • The third segment is on the old "main line" with 3. Nc3, where White defends the e4 pawn. Black is effectively obliged to take on e4, since nothing else makes sense. After 4. Nxe4, Smirnov shows the 4...Nf6 variation with the "super-solid" 5...exf6 after a knight exchange by White. This - the Tartakower variation (which Smirnov doesn't mention by name) - has relatively simple rules for further piece development and Smirnov also shows some typical middlegame ideas. Again, the most critical modern lines aren't shown, but the play presented is reasonable. He also addresses the unsound but difficult-to-face "Alien Gambit" with White playing 5. Ng5 instead of taking on f6.

Although a number of sidelines are not shown (the Two Knights with 2. Nc3, the Fantasy Variation with 3. f3, the King's Indian Attack, etc.), for the core ideas and most popularly-encountered variations, this video - perhaps somewhat surprisingly - actually does live up to being a "crash course" for the Caro-Kann, with enough ideas and examples to get someone started reasonably well at the club level.

28 December 2025

Annotated Game #330: A flexible Stonewall and a false fortress

In this last-round tournament game, I follow an independent line of the Colle and end up in a Stonewall formation with White, which I am normally comfortable playing. However, as has often happened in past games, I accept (and choose) too many cramping versus freeing alternatives, and end up in a worse position. This was no fault of the Stonewall, which can in fact be flexible; see moves 14-18 for some examples in the analysis. In the end, I was lucky that both myself and my opponent believed I had successfully closed the position to further progress, which was not in fact the case, although there was no immediate knockout.


[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "ChessAdmin"] [Black "Class B"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [Annotator "ChessAdmin/Dragon 3.2"] [ECO "D04"] [WhiteFideId "-1"] [BlackFideId "-1"] [PlyCount "60"] [GameId "2254768247188867"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e3 Bf5 4. Nh4 {an independent alternative.} (4. c4 {would transpose into the main line Slow Slav after ...c6}) 4... Bg4 5. f3 Bd7 {choosing to withdraw and preserve the bishop.} 6. Bd3 (6. f4 {may be a better move-order. The point is to nullify the threat of ...g5, trapping the Nh4.}) 6... e6 7. f4 c5 8. c3 {we now have a classic Stonewall structure.} Nc6 9. O-O (9. Nf3 $5 {the knight eventually has to be brought back anyway.}) 9... Qb6 10. Kh1 {the ideas was to get off the a7-g1 diagonal to avoid potential future tactics, although this is not necessary immediately.} (10. Nf3 $11) 10... Be7 11. Nf3 O-O-O {evidently done to avoid a Stonewall Attack on the kingside.} 12. Ne5 {better to develop something else first before moving the knight yet again.} (12. b3) (12. Nbd2) (12. Qe2) 12... Be8 13. Nd2 Nd7 $6 14. Ndf3 $6 {missing my chance to generate a central initiative.} (14. Nxd7 Bxd7 15. dxc5 Bxc5 16. e4 {the standard Colle break, which also leaves Black's Q+B battery hitting nothing but air. I recall looking at the e3-e4 idea, but not liking the Rd8 lined up against my queen on the open file following the pawn exchange. However, after} dxe4 17. Nxe4 $16 {Black has no good way to exploit this, while Qe2 is coming as an excellent queen development.}) 14... f6 15. Nxc6 {wrong knight trade} (15. Nxd7 $14) 15... Qxc6 16. Bd2 $6 {while this gets the bishop (sort of) developed and vacates c1 for a heavy piece, it also cramps the Nf3.} (16. b3 $5 {would give the bishop an alternative outlet and prepare c3-c4.}) 16... Bh5 (16... c4 $5 {and Black's king position would benefit from the closed center.}) 17. Rc1 $6 {this would be a waste of time if Black chose to close the center.} e5 $6 (17... c4) 18. Be2 (18. fxe5 $1 {I confess I never even looked at this idea, being fixated on the threat of e5-e4.} fxe5 19. Nxe5 $1 {I simply assumed the Nf3 was pinned. Instead, this wins a pawn.} Nxe5 (19... Bxd1 20. Nxc6 bxc6 21. Rcxd1 $16) 20. Qxh5 Nxd3 21. Qf5+ Kb8 22. Qxd3 $16 {what an adventure!}) 18... e4 19. Ne1 $6 (19. Ne5 $1 $11 {with similar tactical ideas to the above variation, although no longer winning material}) 19... Bxe2 $17 20. Qxe2 {White is now quite cramped.} b5 $6 {this gives me a chance to break in the center, but I play slowly.} 21. Nc2 $6 {sequencing matters.} (21. c4 bxc4 22. Nc2 $11 {the knight would love to go to d4, and after b2-b3 White has full compensation for the pawn, with all the open lines near Black's king.}) 21... Kc7 $2 (21... c4 $17) 22. b3 $2 {still too slow.} (22. dxc5 $1 {is the other idea to break in the center, involving a pawn sacrifice.} Nxc5 23. Nd4 $16 {at the time, I didn't like the idea of allowing Black's knight to reach d3, but with the threat against the queen he does not have time for that. For example} Qd7 24. c4 dxc4 25. a4 (25. Ba5+ {might be the easier/more human approach} Kb8 26. Bxd8 $16) 25... Nxa4 26. b3 $18 {the Black king's shield is about to dissolve.} Nb6 27. bxc4 bxc4 28. Ra1) (22. c4 $16 {is also still good.}) 22... c4 $1 {my opponent finally plays the strategically correct move, although I can blunt its impact somewhat now.} 23. Qg4 {I recognized here that I was being stifled and hoped to drum up some more active play with the queen.} (23. f5 $5 $17 {was another idea I briefly considered, opening up the h2-b8 diagonal.}) 23... g6 24. Nb4 {nothing better} Bxb4 25. cxb4 f5 26. Qd1 {routing the queen back to the defense.} Nf6 $6 $15 {the knight would have more action on the queenside.} (26... Nb6 $17) 27. a4 {using my only available pawn lever.} (27. Be1 {and Bh4 would reactivate the bishop on the kingside.}) 27... a6 28. bxc4 $2 {"long think, wrong think" here. The idea was of course to set up a blockade after Black retakes on c4.} (28. Bc3 $15 {it's better to simply set up the blockade immediately with the bishop.}) 28... dxc4 $19 {the problem now is that Black has a gorgeous square open on d5 for his knight.} 29. Qc2 Kd6 (29... Nd5 $19) 30. a5 {another long think here. I decided to go with the full blockade rather than try to open the a-file, which I thought Black could exploit.} (30. axb5 axb5 31. d5 $17 {is the engine's pawn sacrifice to get the bishop to a better square after Bc3.}) 30... Kd5 $19 {my opponent now offered a draw, which I was glad to take, although I legitimately thought I could hold (unlike the engine assessment).} 1/2-1/2

27 December 2025

The Adult Chess Improver's Atlas from Grandmaster Secrets

 


The above comes from GM Eugene Perelshteyn's "Grandmaster Secrets" Substack post Where are You on the Adult Improver Map? which is an excellent take on the real improvement process - pursuing legitimate gains in chess strength, not chasing rating. 

Personally, I'm currently located in the Plateau of Pain looking to the northeast (The Endgame Peaks and The Groves of Strategic Planning).

26 December 2025

Annotated Game #329: A Caro-Kann gambit revalidated

This next tournament game saw me as Black equalize early, in one of the very few Caro-Kann gambit lines (Advance Variation with 3...c5). My Expert-level opponent was clearly unfamiliar with this line, which sacrifices a pawn but allows Black dynamic compensation or to regain the material. White, despite some reasonable-looking moves, lost the initiative early and then allowed a tactic which gave me a winning (but not won) position. There was plenty of play left, but the main inflection point was on move 20, where calculation exhaustion led to sub-par results for me in both the calculation and evaluation process. The trajectory of the game continued downwards after that, despite some other chances for me to regain a major advantage.

Despite the loss, the parts of the game where I did play well helped re-validate the opening choice and my knowledge of how to press an advantage. As often occurs in hindsight, playing more simply and with more clarity than complexity would have given me a better game.


[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Expert"] [Black "ChessAdmin"] [Result "1-0"] [Annotator "ChessAdmin/Dragon 3.2"] [ECO "B12"] [WhiteFideId "-1"] [BlackFideId "-1"] [PlyCount "63"] [GameId "2254663898369393"] 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. dxc5 {entering the gambit line.} e6 {solid, but does not take advantage of Black's move order with ...Nc6.} (5... Bg4 {however felt a little loose to me at the time.}) 6. Be3 {the natural move, keeping the pawn.} Nge7 {standard development of the knight.} (6... Nh6 $5 {is an alternate way to play. This takes advantage of the fact that White has already moved the bishop once, so in effect it is a gain of tempo if the bishop takes on h6.} 7. Bxh6 gxh6 8. Bb5 Bxc5 {Black regains the pawn, accepting a long-term kingside pawn weakness but a half-open g-file to play with.}) 7. c4 {played after some thought by my opponent, who was evidently not familiar with this line.} Nf5 $11 {this obvious move now immediately equalizes, with the positional threat of capturing on e3.} 8. Qd2 $6 {apparently the purpose was to allow White to recapture on e3 with the queen, but this still allows me to get the two bishops and the initiative.} (8. Bg5 Be7 9. Bxe7 Qxe7 10. cxd5 exd5 $11) 8... Nxe3 {I decided to go for the simplifying piece exchange, rather than play ...d4 and keep the bishop on the board. Black's (slight) advantage was clearer to me this way.} (8... d4 $5 9. Bf4 {is definitely messier, with the engine suggesting ...f6 as a follow-up.}) 9. Qxe3 d4 {played now, after a good deal of thought. Objectively, it does not give me an advantage, but it does provide full compensation for the pawn. This is more of an attacking move, also controlling c3 and e3.} (9... Qa5+ $5 {was my main alternative, looking to recapture on c5 with the double attack. Now White has to be careful, for example} 10. Nc3 $2 (10. Qd2 {is safest.} Qxd2+ (10... dxc4 $5 {would be a way to keep the queens on the board.} 11. Bxc4 Qxc5) 11. Nbxd2 Bxc5 12. cxd5 exd5 {during the game, I didn't like the idea of having an isolated queen pawn position here, although the engine gives Black (who has the two bishops in an open position) a slight edge.}) 10... Bxc5 {with the threat of d5-d4.}) 10. Qe4 Bxc5 {a logical move, restoring material equality, and I could find nothing better here, although the White queen's placement looked awkward to me.} (10... f5 $5 {is the engine recommendation.} 11. exf6 gxf6 {I actually did think about this briefly, but did not like how airy my king now looked. On the upside, Black now has a more dominant central pawn mass.} 12. Qh4 h5 {taking away the h5 square from the White queen} 13. Nbd2 e5 $15 {Black's central pawn chain provides an advantage, while the king is safe enough.}) 11. Nbd2 a5 {I had another significant think here, primarily about preventing a3/b4 ideas for White. This is a thinking process improvement, paying more attention to preventing my opponent's plans.} 12. O-O-O {I was glad to see this appear on the board, since it seemed to validate my queenside-oriented play. However, it is not in fact bad, and things are still equal.} a4 {the correct reaction, restraining White's b-pawn and preparing to advance further if not stopped.} 13. a3 Qe7 {forming a Q+B battery against a3, with potential sacrificial ideas.} 14. Qc2 {bringing the queen back for defense.} Bd7 {another long think here. There is no decisive tactical continuation, so getting the bishop developed seemed logical.} 15. Bd3 $2 {this is a blunder, allowing the tactical strike} (15. Kb1 $11) 15... Bxa3 $1 {this is a deflection tactic, although it takes another move to fully form.} 16. Ne4 {deciding to preserve the b-pawn.} (16. bxa3 Qxa3+ 17. Qb2 Qxd3 $19 {snapping up the hanging bishop.}) 16... Bc5 $19 {I debated for a while which retreat square, and picked the less good option, although I should still be winning. The text move seemed more solid, defending the d4 pawn again, and I would have been fine with a simplifying minor piece exchange.} (16... Bb4 $19 {would be superior for attacking purposes, however, for example} 17. Kb1 a3 18. b3 O-O $19) 17. Kb1 b6 {this move was the result of over-fancy and inaccurate calcuation involving a potential White capture on c5, although again Black should still be winning.} (17... Nb4 {was the most obviously good move.}) (17... a3 $5 18. b3 Nb4 $19) 18. Qd2 a3 {correctly pressing the advantage.} 19. b3 a2+ (19... Bb4 {I seriously considered, but again rejected placing the bishop on this excellent attacking square.}) 20. Ka1 Na5 $6 {this move was the real let-down, not being able to handle the calculations and evaluations after a prolonged stressful sequence. The threat to b3 is easily handled.} (20... Bb4 $1) (20... O-O {would have sufficed to maintain a strong advantage, but I did not like castling and appearing to place the king in the White pieces' sights.}) 21. Bc2 $1 $17 (21. Be2 $2 Nxb3+ $1) 21... Bc6 $6 {now king safety starts becoming more of an issue for me, as well as having the Rh8 out of play.} (21... O-O) 22. Qf4 $6 {my opponent keeps giving me chances to maintain an advantage, but at this point my understanding of the position has failed.} (22. Nd6+ $5 Bxd6 23. exd6 Qxd6 24. Nxd4 O-O $11) 22... Bxe4 $6 (22... Bb4 $1 {again is best, as the mate threat on c3 cannot be ignored.} 23. Rd3 Bxe4 24. Qxe4 O-O $19) 23. Qxe4 Qa7 $2 {wrong major piece on a7.} (23... Ra7 24. Nxd4 g6 {preparing ...O-O and with at least a small dynamic advantage for Black.}) 24. Nxd4 Bxd4+ {exchanging off a good minor piece, but now White dominates the d-file.} (24... Qb7 {essentially forcing the exchange would be the best defense, but I did not consider the possibility.}) 25. Rxd4 g6 $4 {right general idea, but wrong execution.} (25... Rc8 {and now} 26. b4 $2 {does not work due to} Nc6 $19) 26. b4 $1 {now White just rolls over my position.} Nb7 27. Qc6+ Kf8 28. Rd7 Qa3 29. Qf3 Qxf3 30. gxf3 {the queen trade is no relief, due to White's dominant pieces, especially the Rd7.} Ra7 31. Be4 Kg7 32. Rxb7 1-0

24 December 2025

Training quote of the day #57: Mikhail Shereshevsky

 

From Associative Thinking: How to Connect Patterns and Creativity in Chess by Mikhail Shereshevsky
(Highlighted in IM John Watson's "Books and Beyond" column in the August 2025 Chess Life)

“How does one achieve a high level of play in all stages of a chess game? It seems that everything is simple: learn your openings, work on typical middlegame positions, practice calculating variations and improve your endgame technique. But as soon as you start working on any stage of a chess game, you will encounter the same problem — a huge load on the memory. … In any case, you will try to learn most of the information mechanically, which, of course, is boring and ineffective. What should you do? Stop rote learning, turn on your curiosity, come up with a vivid image for the technique being studied and remember it as an association. And most likely, at the right moment you will recognize it and understand how you need to act.”