22 June 2026

Chess imagery fouls from chess content creators (who should know better)

This blog has occasionally highlighted pop culture chess imagery fouls, which are annoying to encounter, but sometimes are amusing, especially when sourced to creators who probably don't even play chess.

Something relatively new as a phenomenon in chess publishing (mostly online) is the posting of incorrect, sometimes even howlingly bad, chess imagery from chess professionals who are content creators (and should know better). The new-ish normal is that every blog post on the interwebs is expected to have an image at the top, regardless of whether it adds anything to the meaning of the content. I'll put up an image when it makes sense and adds to the post, for example showing a book cover or a chess diagram or a (real) person mentioned in the text.

Generative AI of course is increasingly used to provide images, but it is notoriously bad at chess (and apparently chess imagery as well). Professionals should at the very least do a quick blunder check on the images they are posting. One recent example is pasted below - count the different number of files for White (9) and Black (11) on the impossible chessboard.

Source: https://www.chess.com/blog/attilaturzo/why-life-imitates-chess (as posted June 22, 2026)

More amusing is the following, which was intended as entertainment content in the first place, from https://www.instagram.com/summer_star____/reels/ (screen grab source)


At least this board setup, even if illegal, is physically possible, with the colors and the king/queen positions having been reversed. It's perhaps natural to have a bit of sympathy for an oops by an 1100-rated internet chess influencer that is willing to put herself out there at the National Open, compared with an IM who should really know better.

Training quote of the day #63: Viswanathan Anand

  

From Mind Master: Winning Lessons From A Champion's Life by GM Viswanathan Anand:

The rule of thumb for remembering deeply is to look at a position once, then not look at it for a day, then go over it once again and skip it for three days, and then go back and look at it yet again. By the eighth time you’ve looked at it, your brain has already encoded the memory and every time you come back to it, it only gets reinforced. In recent years, what I often do is take photographs of all the positions I want to revise and keep them on my phone. When I’m on a flight, I flip through them. The idea is to expose my brain to what I want it to recall. This exercise, though, is unlikely to offer results if done over too short a span of time. By the third time the brain may have switched off. If done on an irregular schedule for one or two weeks, by the end of the second week the image of the positions on the board would have lodged itself in the mind. Although, even that may not be permanent. It’s helpful to revise the position or idea a month later, repeat the same after three more months and by the end of the year it should have set up camp in your brain. The only guarantee to remembering is periodic revision. The intervals can be lengthened, but at the end of each break there should be a refresher course waiting.

21 June 2026

Annotated Game #345: Rich content, abrupt ending

In this first-round tournament game, a fairly complex Caro-Kann Advance, I burn almost all of my time navigating the middlegame, leaving not enough energy to keep up with my opponent's ideas and threats. The ending is therefore rather abrupt, but I give credit to my opponent for continuing to come up with ideas that at least appeared threatening on the kingside, which distracted me from achieving a meaningful breakthrough with queenside counterplay. This game was rich in typical ideas for the opening and middlegame structure, however, so I feel I learned a lot examining it.

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2026.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Class A"] [Black "ChessAdmin"] [Result "1-0"] [Annotator "ChessAdmin/Dragon 3.2"] [ECO "B12"] [WhiteFideId "-1"] [BlackFideId "-1"] [PlyCount "99"] [GameId "2300420729859133"] 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. c3 Nc6 5. Nf3 Bg4 {now White has several options, although Be2 is by far the most played, in order to break the pin on the Nf3.} 6. Be3 cxd4 7. cxd4 e6 $11 {my personal "book" ended here. Black has a very reasonable game and has fully equalized.} 8. Bb5 {an obvious option, developing the bishop with a pin and preparing to castle, but relatively little played in the database.} Bb4+ {with the c3 pawn gone, Black has this similar, tempo-gaining response.} 9. Nc3 Nge7 {completing Black's ideal minor piece development structure.} 10. O-O O-O {a safe, if uninspired, choice.} (10... Qa5 $5 {is a way to increase the pressure on White before castling. White will need to withdraw or protect the Bb5 again in some fashion, as a "removal of the guard" is threatened against the Nc3.}) 11. Bd3 {my opponent evidently was looking for a more active diagonal for the bishop. I of course want to neutralize it, and chose the most direct way.} Bf5 (11... Nf5 $15 {is the standard move in these positions, for a reason. Black would be happy to have White exchange bishop for knight on f5, and meanwhile the knight exerts pressure on the e3/d4 central squares.} 12. h3 {I hallucinated was an option for White, which is refuted by} Bxf3 13. Qxf3 Ncxd4 $17 {since White's attack is easily repelled after} 14. Bxd4 Nxd4 15. Qg4 Nc6 16. f4 g6 {and White does not have enough forces left to successfully throw at Black's king.} 17. f5 $2 Qb6+ 18. Kh1 Nxe5 $19) 12. a3 Bxc3 {the dark-square bishop is hemmed in by White's pawns, so is happy to exchange itself for the Nc3.} 13. bxc3 Rc8 {activating the rook on the half-open file.} 14. Rc1 Bxd3 {exchanging bishops, thereby reducing White's potential attacking forces on the kingside.} (14... h6 $5 {would be useful prophylaxis to defend the g5 square from White's minor pieces.}) 15. Qxd3 Ng6 {I wanted to block the h7-b1 diagonal, but it was not necessary to commit the piece, which could have a better future on f5.} (15... h6 {again comes into consideration, taking away the g5 square from White. Ng6 is still an option if needed.}) 16. Bg5 {the most active option.} Qa5 {with counterplay against the a-pawn, to keep the position level.} (16... Nge7 {the engine assesses it is best to simply go back with the knight. It is difficult psychologically for humans to retract a recent move, howeer.}) 17. Ra1 $6 {static defense from my opponent.} (17. h4 $5 {is a more active option that would keep me under some pressure.} h6 18. h5 Nge7 $11) 17... h6 18. Bd2 Qa4 {removing the queen from the bishop's diagonal, while restraining c3-c4.} 19. Rfb1 {activating the rook on the b-file.} Na5 {protecting b7 while eyeing the jump to c4.} (19... b6 {is also good, simply ending the pressure on the b-file.}) 20. Rb4 {this was a bit of a surprise, but not really a problem for me.} Qd7 21. h4 {White again turns his attention to kingside play. This is objectively best according to the engine, but seemed a bit contradictory, given the recent transfer of the rook from f1 to b4.} Nc4 {the knight takes up its position on the outpost square.} 22. Bc1 {choosing to take the time to preserve the bishop.} (22. h5 $5) 22... Rc7 {the idea of course is to double on the c-file. This is good enough for continued equality.} (22... b6 $15 {is preferred by the engine, which locks down the b-file and brings into focus the relatively poor placement of White's rooks.}) 23. a4 b6 24. g4 $2 {a significantly weakening move in objective terms, although broadly speaking White does best with kingside play. However, I did not understand the position sufficiently well to correctly combat the aggressive thrust.} (24. h5 Ne7 $11) 24... Ne7 $15 {a reasonable retreat, although there was a better option.} (24... f5 $1 {I did not consider this idea seriously enough this early in the game. Let's see why the f-pawn break works so well, which is thematic in French Defense-type structures.} 25. exf6 Rxf6 26. g5 {and now} Rf5 $19 {would block the Qd3's attack on the Ng6, which I missed, thinking instead the knight would be hanging. Despite even material, Black will soon be able to exploit open files on the kingside better than White, using the mobile heavy pieces. For example} 27. gxh6 gxh6 28. Bxh6 $2 Qh7 $19) 25. Kg2 {this is too slow.} Kh8 $6 {not a terrible move in itself, but it is overly passive and I am letting White play his preferred game.} (25... f5 $1 {again looks best.}) (25... Nc6 $17 {is another good, active option.}) 26. Bf4 {clearing the first rank for the rook.} Rfc8 $6 {my sense of danger is a bit underdeveloped, evidently. While adding to the queenside counterplay, this is not a forcing move and removes a defender from the f-file.} (26... a5 {at least I considered this option. I thought that it would simply force the rook back to a better square after} 27. Rbb1 {but} Ng6 $15 {this move now comes with tempo and can be effectively followed by ...f5! once the bishop retreats.}) (26... Ng6 $15 {followed by ...a5 or ...f5 is also good, although it is funny to see the knight bounce around so much.}) 27. Rh1 $6 {this effectively abandons the a-pawn for not enough compensation, but I did not pay enough attention to the opportunity to win it by removing the Rb4 defender.} Na5 $6 {this is still equal, but de-activates the knight in exchange for increased pressure down the c-file.} (27... a5 28. Rbb1 Qxa4 $17 {Black is simply a pawn down with no compensation. For example} 29. g5 $2 h5 $1 {and White has no attack.}) 28. Bd2 $11 {the simple solution, shoring up the c3 square.} Nc4 29. Be1 $2 {giving up the wrong diagonal, as the bishop is much more effective while on c1-h6.} (29. Bg5 $5 {is now an option, as White would win if the h-file were opened.}) 29... Rg8 {if the rook had to go back to protect the king, then f8 is a better square.} (29... Ng6 $1 {is most active and is threatening a fork on f4, now that the bishop has departed the c1-h6 diagonal.}) 30. Ng5 {an unwelcome surprise, forcing me to think hard. I immediately saw that the knight was untouchable, due to the mate on the h-file if opened.} Ng6 $1 $17 {best and forced.} 31. Kg3 {an aggressive way of meeting the fork threat on f4.} f5 $5 {better late than never, for this break.} (31... Qe8 {is the more solid choice.}) 32. gxf5 exf5 {you can see how the break is less advantageous without having a rook on the f-file to recapture with.} 33. f4 {this was expected. Now I am fine, even with an advantage according to the engine, but it is still difficult to find ideas to make progress. Time pressure was also starting to make itself felt at this point.} Nf8 $6 {with the obvious idea of blockading on e6.} (33... Ne7 $17 {is the engine's preferred square for the knight, leaving the 8th rank open to reposition the Rg8, while also protecting both f5 and d5.}) 34. Rb1 $6 {choosing to fully abandon the a-pawn, apparently in the hopes of continuing the kingside attack with an additional rook.} (34. Rxc4 {is the engine line, although this is hardly an obvious exchange sacrifice.} dxc4 35. Qf3 $11 {White's compensation lies in the form of the e/d central pawn roller.}) 34... g6 $1 {now that the king has an escape square on g7, the Ng5 is in fact threatened.} 35. Nf3 Ne6 $17 {I felt I could wait and grab the a-pawn later. However, this allows my opponent to re-think his abandonment of it.} (35... Qxa4 $17) 36. Rb4 {this is a more awkward square for the rook.} (36. Ra1) 36... Rg7 $6 {here I was tired from all of the calculating and feeling the time pressure, and still did not have an idea of how to make real progress. The rook looks good opposed to White's king on the g-file, but White's lock on the g5 square means the rook is also effectively locked out of the game.} (36... Rgc8 $17 {this both redeploys the rook to a useful square and gives my king another escape square, if needed.}) 37. Ng1 $2 {White definitely should improve the knight, but this is not the way. However, in response I again make non-threatening moves without generating counterplay, giving my opponent time to mobilize his forces.} (37. Nd2 $11) 37... Kg8 (37... a5 {this idea is again effective, looking to drive away the a-pawn's protector.} 38. Rb5 {and now} Rb7 $17 {with either ...Nc7 or ...Na3 as a follow-up is a solid way to obtain an advantage.}) 38. Nh3 {I am fine up to this opint, but am still neglecting counterplay.} h5 $6 {there were several more active options here.} (38... Qc6) (38... a5) (38... Rb7) 39. Kf3 Rc6 (39... a5 $1 {I keep ignoring this idea.}) 40. Rg1 {targeting the weakness on g6, which however will be difficult to attack further.} Nf8 $6 $11 {this was simply unnecessary.} (40... a5 41. Rb1 Rc7 42. Qd1 Rb7 43. Nf2 b5 $15 {and I have the initiative on the queenside, while White has nothing on the kingside.}) 41. Rg2 Qc8 {continuing to play somewhat aimlessly. This unfortunately removes my queen from the e8-a4 diagonal, meaning it is no longer a threat to the a4 pawn.} 42. Re2 Ne6 43. Kg3 Qe8 44. Qf3 Nc7 {my intent was just to shuffle pieces at this point, but probably this was better done with the queen.} (44... Qd8) (44... Qd7) 45. Nf2 Qd7 46. Nd3 Re6 47. Ra2 Rc6 {I still have an equal but increasingly awkward game, as my pieces are not harmonized and lack squares, especially the rooks.} 48. Rb1 {I miss the point of the move, which liberates the b4 square.} Ne6 $2 {with a few minutes on my clock for the remainder of the game, I miss White's next, which forks the rook and d5.} (48... Kh7 $11) (48... Re6 $11) 49. Nb4 $16 Na5 $2 (49... Nc7 {limits the damage, although still gives White the Exchange.} 50. Nxc6 Qxc6 $16) 50. Nxd5 $1 $18 {my opponent correctly passes up the exchange and goes for a more consequential move. A fork is now threatened on f6 and the e/d central pawn roller is activated, making the position resignable.} 1-0

14 June 2026

Training quote of the day #62: Viswanathan Anand

 

From Mind Master: Winning Lessons From A Champion's Life by GM Viswanathan Anand:

...I'd methodically write the notations down in neat letters and often underline - with a belligerent double streak - the notes on the portions of the game where I'd blundered. As I grew older, this practice slowly grew on me. Putting down my observations right after a defeat when the pain was raw and the sting was fresh, I stumbled upon the solutions I had seen but didn't act upon or the ones I had overlooked. Not only did it help me spot my mistakes but it also gave me a macro perspective of whether the misses fit into some sort of a worrying pattern that needed to be eliminated. After a win, I'd usually allow myself some room and stay away from this process a little longer before the cadaver was laid out for close examination. I was still curious to know if I played a line in the best way possible, but the urge was not as strong as it was following defeats or missed opportunities. It was also a brilliant way to funnel my emotions after a game - angst, remorse or delirium - and study the results objectively. Once this practice became routine, after every game I couldn't wait to revisit what I did or didn't do. Suddenly, I began to feel that without that understanding my experience was almost incomplete.

06 June 2026

FT article: (Chess fan) George Russell talks tactics and sharing a garage with the teenage F1 leader

 

Along with other recent pop culture references about chess, it's interesting to track the image of chess (and chessplayers) projected in the media. For example, the print version of the Financial Times on June 5 had a leader (see above screenshot) "Chess fan George Russell plots his next move after early setbacks" for the article George Russell talks tactics and sharing a garage with the teenage F1 leader

The online version linked above does not mention chess in the leader, and there's relatively little about it in the article itself - only a mention of how driver George Russell likes to be competitive off the Formula 1 circuit as well, playing a lot of online chess. Chess is nonetheless associated with strategic thinking, competitiveness, and glamorous international sport. For we chessplayers (amateur or professional), this type of positive halo effect is always nice to see.

In the spirit of this blog's periodic training quotes of the day, here's one from the article that is worth considering:

“The way I looked at it is that every season before this, when I wasn’t fighting for a championship, my objective was always to get the most out of every single day on track,” he says. “Whether that meant fighting for victory or only fighting for fifth position, the goal was always the same: drive as fast as possible and maximise the things I can control.

“That approach led me to this point in my career, where I’m now fighting for a championship, so why should I change anything?”