04 July 2026

Annotated Game #347: First victory in the Dutch Defense

It took three tries, but this final-round tournament game was my first victory as a "pure" Dutch Defense player (after 1. d4 f5). The previous (second time) was in Annotated Game #343, when I faced the 2. Bg5 sideline. Here I face the other main sideline, with 2. Nc3 followed by 3. Bg5. The main difference is that the move-order allows Black to play 2...Nf6 first, which significantly changes the dynamics. Although I mis-remember the standard line afterwards (3...d5), I get a reasonable game; it is nice to know that even in the Dutch the moves are not necessarily on knife-edge all the time. One significant flaw was 8...Kf7?!, an idea that was repeated (if not quite as horribly) from the previous game, so that is something to remember.

After that, my opponent got some early pressure with an h-pawn advance, but then - as often occurs at the Class level - she prematurely dissipated the tension, so I was able to equalize without difficulty. By around move 18 the position is largely symmetrical and I felt was rather boring, so I tried to spice things up on the h-file, misjudging my strategic chances there and also having board vision problems with the blunder 21...Rh6? My opponent evidently was also bored with the position and tried to be aggressive with 22. c4?! which makes the situation complex and allowed me to go astray. There is a lot of tactical back-and-forth afterwards, which I'll leave to the game annotations, but basically I held on until I spotted a winning tactic and turned the tables on my opponent. Perhaps this was a fitting way to obtain a first win in the Dutch.

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Class B"] [Black "ChessAdmin"] [Result "0-1"] [Annotator "ChessAdmin/Dragon 3.2"] [ECO "A80"] [WhiteFideId "-1"] [BlackFideId "-1"] [PlyCount "88"] [GameId "2290996243980105"] {[%evp 0,88,10,38,40,25,34,23,48,74,29,16,17,38,37,14,4,2,22,39,53,89,60,37,39,60,14,1,35,39,39,16,-82,-54,-37,-9,-98,20,0,-41,-127,-57,-14,-40,32,-112,-28,-33,-54,-11,21,-51,-141,-140,147,109,172,85,134,-31,1,-149,-321,-404,-342,-397,-417,-404,-231,-426,-303,-327,-1,1,-20,1,-178,-203,-419,-824,-959,-994,-837,-943,-994,-999,-967,-1148,-1147,-1356,-1528]} 1. d4 f5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Bg5 {while the setup for White is the same (by transposition) as the 2.Bg5 variation played in the previous Dutch game, the move-order means that Black has the Nf6 developed instead of ...g6, which changes things.} g6 {preparing to play ...Bg7 and then eliminate White's chance for doubling the f-pawns. White's reaction is expected.} (3... d5 {is actually considered the standard move here.}) 4. Bxf6 exf6 {in exchange for the doubled pawns, Black contests the e5 square and has the two bishops.} 5. e3 d5 {obtaining a lock on the e4 square and preparing for a Stonewall-type setup on the light squares.} 6. Bd3 c6 {here the square may be better occupied by the knight.} (6... Nc6 $5 {with ...Be6 coming next, there is no need to protect d5 with the c-pawn.}) (6... Be6 {immediately also keeps things flexible, as the bishop should go here anyway.}) 7. Nge2 {clearly aiming at the f4 square.} Bd6 {clearly the best square for the bishop, while contesting f4.} 8. h4 $5 {my opponent is evidently in an aggressive mood.} Kf7 $6 {this is not as disastrous a move as in the previous Dutch game, but still not ideal.} (8... Qe7 {for example would develop the queen to its normal square in the Dutch and await developments.}) (8... h5 $5) 9. h5 $14 {the obvious and good choice, creating tension on g6.} b6 $6 {this is too slow an idea, to develop with ...Ba6, that also does not really work.} (9... a5 {gets things going on the queenside, with ...b5 or ...Na6 to follow.}) 10. hxg6+ $6 {I was fine with this reduction in tension, since White is not yet positioned to exploit the h-file.} hxg6 $11 11. Kd2 {this looks funny, but the king is safe enough and it is the quickest way to get out the queen and the Ra1.} Na6 $1 {the engine awards a "!" for developing the correct piece to a6, as other moves give White an advantage; I had concluded that my original idea of putting the bishop there would not be useful. Both sides are now developed to an equivalent degree, while both kings are a little awkwardly placed.} 12. Rxh8 Qxh8 13. Qh1 Bb7 {protecting the Qh8 and maintaining the tension on the h-file.} (13... Qxh1 {the engine prefers to simply exchange immediately,as White has no way to do anything with the h-file afterwards.} 14. Rxh1 Nb4 $11 {White could now check on h7, but then would have to go back with the rook after ...Kg8, with no progress made.} (14... Kg7 $11 {would even prevent that if Black felt cautious.})) 14. a3 Nc7 {the standard maneuver in the Dutch when the Na6 no longer has a potential future on b4.} 15. Nf4 Bxf4 {I judged this an even trade, since my bishop has little scope on the dark squares and White's knight is on a good square.} 16. exf4 {the pawn structure is now symmetrical, and I expected a draw as the likeliest outcome.} Ne6 17. Ne2 c5 18. c3 {around here I started becoming a little bored with the position and wanted to try to make something happen on the h-file. This was a bad idea in general, although causes no harm initially.} Qg7 {clearing the square for the rook.} (18... c4 {would further clamp down the position and leave less room for counterplay.}) 19. a4 Rh8 20. Qg1 a6 {this is OK, but leaves White the possibility of the a4-a5 advance.} (20... a5) (20... Qh6 {would be the logical continuation of the h-file idea and put pressue on the f4 pawn; however, neither goes anywhere after the obvious g2-g3 in response.}) 21. b3 Rh6 $2 {unfortunately now I hallucinate and think I can get something going on the h-file, with the rook leading a Q+R battery. This loses me time and misplaces my heavy pieces. Everything else reasonable is completely equal.} (21... Qh6 $11) (21... Qf8) (21... a5) (21... cxd4) 22. c4 $6 {this very much complicated the game and I thought and calcuated (poorly) for a long time here. It illustrates what would have been the practical value of playing ...c4 earlier, to shut down the possibility, even though the engine says Black is now better.} (22. a5 $1 $16 {this would force a breakthrough on the queenside, taking advantage of Black's rook and queen being too far from the action.} b5 {is what I would have played} 23. dxc5 Nxc5 24. Bc2 $18 {the problem is that f2-f3 is now coming, after which White's queen can penetrate on the g1-a7 diagonal.}) 22... Qh7 $6 {stubbornly continuing with the terrible h-file plan.} (22... cxd4 {taking the pawn on offer is of course the critical path.} 23. f3 Qf8 $1 {repositioning the queen to the center} 24. Nxd4 Nxf4 25. Qe3 Qd6 $17 {the queen successfully defends everything.} 26. g3 $2 {attempting to exploit the pin on the Nf4 fails to} Qb4+ $1 27. Kc2 {and now control of the h-file actually pays off after} Rh2+ $19) (22... Qf8 {would profitably keep the pawn tension while getting the queen back into the real action.} 23. f3 (23. dxc5 $2 Nxc5 24. Qb1 Qd6 $19) 23... Qd6 $17) (22... Qh8 $11 {at least would be much better than the text move, if I insisted on keeping it on the h-file, but somehow I thought the queen was better placed on the (blocked) 7th rank.}) 23. f3 {this allows various good defensive moves, none of which I find.} (23. cxd5 Bxd5 24. Bc4 Bxc4 25. bxc4 cxd4 26. Qb1 $16) 23... cxd4 $2 {only now do I take the pawn, after walling my queen off so it cannot get back to the center to assist. The explanation is that I hallucinated being able to play ...Rh1 at some point, which of course simply loses material.} (23... Qh8 $11 {is probably simplest.}) 24. cxd5 $16 {advantageous but not decisive.} (24. Nxd4 $1 {breaks through in the center.} Nxf4 25. Qe3 $18) 24... Bxd5 25. Bc4 $6 {this gives me an out.} (25. Nxd4 {again is best, although not as devastating after} Nc5 $16) 25... Bxc4 26. bxc4 Nc5 $6 {still refusing to see the value of redeploying the queen.} (26... Qh8 $15) 27. Rb1 $1 {I misjudged the strength of this, although could have mitigated White's threats with proper play.} Kg8 $2 {wrong square, although right idea to open up the 7th rank for the queen. It looked wrong to send my king to e8 and the open center.} (27... Ke8 28. Qxd4 {and now} Qd7 {is possible.} 29. Rxb6 Qxd4+ 30. Nxd4 Rh2 $11) 28. a5 $18 {things are looking bad for Black, although} (28. Qxd4 $1 $18 {is more decisive.}) 28... d3 {I decided counterattacking was my only hope, to try to pressure White into an error.} 29. Nc3 {good enough to maintain a winning advantage, but still not putting me away.} (29. axb6 $1 $18) 29... Rh2 {finally the rook actually does something, projecting power along the 2nd rank, and my opponent misses the potential threat. Time pressure started to be a factor around here.} 30. Rxb6 $4 {this looks good visually, with the rook breaking into my back ranks and king wide open, but I have (only) one good move to play.} (30. Qf2 $18) 30... Qh3 $1 $19 {now the situation is flipped and White is losing, thanks to her vulnerable king and the pin on the now indefensible g-pawn.} 31. Rb8+ Kg7 32. Ke3 Rxg2 {while we both were relatively low on time by this point, my opponent's clock situation was worse, and further deteriorated under pressure.} 33. Qb1 Qh2 {I thought for a while here. There are several possibilities for follow up with the queen, so I went with what I calculated should be a sure win, if not the fastest.} (33... Qg3 $5) 34. Kd4 Ne6+ {I decided to go with what I thought was more forcing checks with the knight, with little time to calculate everything.} (34... Nd7 $1 35. Kd5 Qxf4 $19) 35. Kd5 {my opponent is fighting hard and again there is a crossroads. Unfortunately I see the necessary idea (...Qxf4) but do not play it immediately, thinking the check is safer first.} Nc7+ $6 (35... Qxf4 $19 {sacrificing the knight is the way to go, with White's king too exposed in the center.} 36. Kxe6 Qxc4+ 37. Nd5 Qc6+ 38. Ke7 Re2+ {with mate to follow}) 36. Kc6 $1 $11 Qxf4 {now although my knight is preserved, there is no forced win, as the White king is closer to protection.} 37. Qb4 $2 {a reasonable-looking move, but not forcing enough.} (37. Rb7 {pins the knight, so after} Qxc4+ 38. Kb6 $11 {remarkably Black has nothing better than a draw.}) 37... Kh6 $1 $19 {now my king has time to escape and hide on g5.} 38. Qf8+ Kg5 39. Qd8 Qxc4+ {this is now decisive.} 40. Kb7 Rb2+ 41. Ka7 Rxb8 42. Kxb8 Qxc3 {the best move, ensuring a won K+P endgame if White captures on c7.} 43. Qd6 d2 {passed pawns must be pushed} 44. Qg3+ Kh6 {and now White flagged in a lost position.} 0-1

03 July 2026

Annotated Game #346: Passive materialism is bad

This second-round tournament game features an interesting Colle vs. Queen's Indian setup. Black is a little over-aggressive in the opening, but I am not able to keep the small advantage obtained as a result. My opponent then doubles down on the aggression with 16...f4? - I initially respond correctly, but then make a far too materialistic decision to play passively, instead of dynamically with a significant advantage. Black continues to actively press and his attack essentially plays itself, as a result. An object lesson in the superior dynamic value of pieces.

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "ChessAdmin"] [Black "Class B"] [Result "0-1"] [Annotator "ChessAdmin/Dragon 3.2"] [ECO "A47"] [WhiteFideId "-1"] [BlackFideId "-1"] [PlyCount "86"] [GameId "2290193471588575"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 b6 3. e3 e6 4. Bd3 Bb7 5. Nbd2 {while this is normally considered a flexible move and covers e4, castling first scores much better in the database. White need not fear an early ...Ne4.} (5. O-O Ne4 6. Nbd2 f5 {is what I wanted to avoid.} 7. Ne5 $5 {looks good, however, as Black is a bit behind in development.} Qh4 8. f4 $14) 5... Nc6 $6 {this blocks the Bb7 unnecessarily.} 6. O-O (6. c3 $5 {the standard Colle setup would be a good option as well.}) (6. a3 $5 {would now allow for b2-b4 and Bb2, with more space, as there is no pawn on c5 to block White's queenside expansion.}) 6... d5 7. b3 {not the best suited to the needs of the position, because of Black's ability to play the annoying knight sortie to b4.} (7. c3) (7. a3) (7. c4 $5) 7... Nb4 $11 8. Be2 Ne4 $6 {overly aggressive.} 9. Nxe4 (9. Bb2 {covering the c3 square for some reason did not occur to me.}) 9... dxe4 10. Ne5 $14 {I've perhaps regained a bit of opening advantage, with Black's king still in the center.} f6 11. Nc4 (11. Bh5+ {unfortunately does not work, although I looked at it seriously.} g6 {and White will not have enough for the material.} 12. Nxg6 (12. Bxg6+ hxg6 13. Nxg6 Rh6 14. Nxf8 Qd6 15. h3 Qxf8 $19) 12... hxg6 13. Bxg6+ Kd7 $19 {White has no attack.}) 11... Be7 12. a3 {this is nothing special.} (12. c3 $5 {would reinforce d4 again and create a bit more room for the White pieces.} Nd5 13. Bd2) 12... Nd5 $11 {this surprised me, although it's rather obvious.} 13. Bb2 O-O 14. Nd2 {this is a useful retreat, as the knight is exposed to b6-b5 ideas on c4, but there is no pressure on Black.} (14. f3 $5 {now would be useful, giving White a tempo up for kingside play.} f5 (14... b5 15. fxe4 bxc4 16. exd5 Qxd5 17. Bf3 Qb5 $11) 15. fxe4 fxe4 16. Bg4 Qd7) 14... f5 15. c4 {the correct reaction, gaining queenside space and kicking the knight.} Nf6 16. f3 $6 {the timing is now wrong for this, as the Nf6 helps cover the kingside better, while White's prospects look better on the queenside now.} (16. b4) 16... f4 $2 {this immediately looked wrong - I had not considered the response - and it should lead to a clear advantage for White.} 17. exf4 $1 {after some thought, I correctly concluded taking the pawn on offer was best.} e3 {this was the natural expectation, but unfortunately I miscalculated the response.} 18. Nb1 $2 {this is terribly passive and materialistic, trying to simply hold onto the extra pawn. It removes the knight from the immediate fight, as well as locking the a1 rook away.} (18. Ne4 $1 {is critical.} Nxe4 (18... Bxe4 19. fxe4 Nxe4 20. Qd3 $18) 19. fxe4 Bxe4 {somehow I hallucinated and thought my f-pawn would fall at this point.} 20. Qc1 $16 {now the e3 pawn is doomed.}) 18... Nh5 {in contrast, Black now plays easily and dynamically.} 19. Qd3 {I initially thought this solved my problems.} (19. Bc1 $19 {another bad-looking retreat, but it would force Black to find} c5 $1 {to maintain the advantage.} 20. Bxe3 cxd4 21. Bxd4 (21. Qxd4 Bc5 $19) 21... Nxf4 $19 {with a strong attack once Black can get in ...Qg5, after playing ...Bc5/Bd6}) 19... Nxf4 20. Qxe3 Bd6 $19 (20... Bg5 $19 {is even more effective, lining up on the queen.}) 21. Nc3 $2 Qg5 $1 {I completely missed this, although Black was already winning. Now there are no good choices.} 22. Kf2 Qxg2+ 23. Ke1 Qxh2 24. Kd2 Rf6 25. Ne4 (25. Rh1 {unfortunately does not solve things.} Ng2 (25... Qg3 {is the engine line, which requires some deeper calculation to ensure regaining the material.} 26. Rag1 Nxe2 27. Rxg3 Nxg3 $19 {and now if} 28. Qe1 Nxh1 29. Qxh1 Bxf3 {Black is ahead on material count and has White's king exposed.}) 26. Qd3 Qf4+ 27. Kc2 Rg6 $19 {Black can now reorganize his pieces with ...Rf8, ...Qf7 and ...Nf4 and continue the winning attack.}) 25... Bxe4 {an excellent decision, trading off a key defender.} 26. Qxe4 Qxe2+ {my opponent now makes the good practical decision to go for the simplified winning endgame.} 27. Qxe2 Nxe2 28. Kxe2 Bf4 {now Black's pieces are all at least as well-laced as mine, plus he has the outside passed h-pawn which should decide the game. My only chance for a swindle at this point is to try to create some potential for Black to blunder tactically.} 29. Rad1 Re8 30. Kf2 Rh6 {usefully occupying the h-file and removing the rook from a discovered attack on the long diagonal.} 31. Rg1 Rh2+ {this essentially forces a rook trade and seals the game for Black.} 32. Rg2 Rxg2+ 33. Kxg2 Kf7 34. Re1 (34. Rh1 {looks active but is not a threat. For example} Rd8 35. Rxh7 $2 Bh6 {trapping the rook.}) 34... g5 35. Rh1 Kg6 36. Re1 h5 37. d5 Kf5 38. Kf2 e5 {bringing another piece into the attack and highlighting how I have no counterplay at all.} 39. Rh1 h4 {the h-pawn is now too strong, although there was nothing really to be done about it.} 40. Rd1 e4 41. b4 exf3 42. Kxf3 Re3+ 43. Kf2 Rb3 {with more material loss on the way and a hopeless position, now is a good time to resign.} 0-1

25 June 2026

Training quote of the day #64: Viswanathan Anand

   

From Mind Master: Winning Lessons From A Champion's Life by GM Viswanathan Anand:

Principally, winning in chess is centred on your emotions. It’s the moments when you lose control over your emotions that decide the outcome of your games. The tactics players employ, therefore, have as much to do with progressing on the board as with drawing opponents out of their comfort zones, then lying in wait for them to wander into a mistake.

22 June 2026

Chess imagery fouls from chess content creators (who should know better)

This blog has occasionally highlighted pop culture chess imagery fouls, which are annoying to encounter, but sometimes are amusing, especially when sourced to creators who probably don't even play chess.

Something relatively new as a phenomenon in chess publishing (mostly online) is the posting of incorrect, sometimes even howlingly bad, chess imagery from chess professionals who are content creators (and should know better). The new-ish normal is that every blog post on the interwebs is expected to have an image at the top, regardless of whether it adds anything to the meaning of the content. I'll put up an image when it makes sense and adds to the post, for example showing a book cover or a chess diagram or a (real) person mentioned in the text.

Generative AI of course is increasingly used to provide images, but it is notoriously bad at chess (and apparently chess imagery as well). Professionals should at the very least do a quick blunder check on the images they are posting. One recent example is pasted below - count the different number of files for White (9) and Black (11) on the impossible chessboard.

Source: https://www.chess.com/blog/attilaturzo/why-life-imitates-chess (as posted June 22, 2026)

More amusing is the following, which was intended as entertainment content in the first place, from https://www.instagram.com/summer_star____/reels/ (screen grab source)


At least this board setup, even if illegal, is physically possible, with the colors and the king/queen positions having been reversed. It's perhaps natural to have a bit of sympathy for an oops by an 1100-rated internet chess influencer that is willing to put herself out there at the National Open, compared with an IM who should really know better.

Training quote of the day #63: Viswanathan Anand

  

From Mind Master: Winning Lessons From A Champion's Life by GM Viswanathan Anand:

The rule of thumb for remembering deeply is to look at a position once, then not look at it for a day, then go over it once again and skip it for three days, and then go back and look at it yet again. By the eighth time you’ve looked at it, your brain has already encoded the memory and every time you come back to it, it only gets reinforced. In recent years, what I often do is take photographs of all the positions I want to revise and keep them on my phone. When I’m on a flight, I flip through them. The idea is to expose my brain to what I want it to recall. This exercise, though, is unlikely to offer results if done over too short a span of time. By the third time the brain may have switched off. If done on an irregular schedule for one or two weeks, by the end of the second week the image of the positions on the board would have lodged itself in the mind. Although, even that may not be permanent. It’s helpful to revise the position or idea a month later, repeat the same after three more months and by the end of the year it should have set up camp in your brain. The only guarantee to remembering is periodic revision. The intervals can be lengthened, but at the end of each break there should be a refresher course waiting.