I should have drawn the following tournament game, an Exchange Caro-Kann, at multiple points. However, my opponent pressed effectively and induced errors on the defense, ending up with what should have been a won queen ending (after it was very much a drawn queen ending). A comedy of errors then ensued, with a draw at the end - which was the right outcome from my perspective, even if wrongly achieved. Still, "drawing ugly" is almost as good as "winning ugly". The overwhelming importance of queen activity, especially versus a bare king, is a major takeaway from examining the ending.
Path to Chess Mastery
An examination of training and practical concepts for the improving chessplayer
02 March 2026
Annotated Game #338: A queen ending, or a comedy of errors
01 March 2026
Annotated Game #337: Winning less ugly
One of the truths of chess - that we sometimes overlook - is that for us to win, our opponent has to make a mistake; winning is therefore not simply attributable to our brilliance. Normally both sides make significant mistakes, hence Lasker's published observation (also attributed to Tartakower) "The winner of a game of chess is he who makes the last mistake but one."
In this next tournament game, if the result is perhaps not due to brilliant thought, I can at least say that I won less ugly than in Annotated Game #336. I make the strategic error of exchanging queens in the early middlegame, which erased my small advantage, but shortly afterwards I was able to induce a blunder of a pawn by my opponent. For the rest of the game, although we both could have improved our play, there were no huge mistakes and I convert the endgame in a solid fashion.
When you know you have a winning advantage (but not yet a won game), whatever way you can find at the board to successfully realize it is the best path. Engines will of course point out other moves, which normally are considered "better" simply because they win faster. However, there are no bonus points for finishing earlier. Here I again follow NM Dan Heisman's excellent practical advice to "go to sleep" in the endgame when winning, which means taking care to cover your weaknesses and deny your opponent counterplay, only then focusing on calculating the necessary winning breakthrough. If your advantage is structural, then you can afford to do this, and not spend precious energy trying to calculate complex variations, which have the potential to go awry.
28 February 2026
Chess as part of lifetime cognitive enrichment
A recent study published in Neurology - read the abstract here - has been highlighted in the press, including in this Washington Post article. The general conclusion, from the abstract:
Lifetime exposure to cognitive enrichment was related to lower risk of AD dementia and a slower rate of cognitive decline, including after adjustment for common ADRD pathologies, indicating higher resilience provided by lifetime enrichment. Our results suggest that cognitive health in later life is in part the product of lifetime exposure to cognitive enrichment.
An excerpt from expert commentary in the WaPo article, which also cited some other recent studies in the area:
The findings nod to the concept of “cognitive reserve”— the idea, popularized by Columbia University neuropsychologist Yaakov Stern, that the brain can adapt to damage or aging by relying on alternative networks or strategies. The theory is that mentally demanding activities over a lifetime may strengthen neural connections, giving the brain more flexibility to compensate.
The Neurology study apparently cited chess as particularly impactful among older people, although practicing it as a complex skill - similar to playing a musical instrument or learning a foreign language - has value in exercising your cognitive functions at any stage of life. What all these practices have in common is the requirement for "effortful study" to both improve and maintain a higher level of performance.
While the intrinsic motivation to excel at something you enjoy doing is probably the most powerful impulse for chess improvement, it is certainly good to have more indications that positive brain health outcomes are also associated with it.
24 February 2026
Annotated Game #336: Breaking the streak
Winning ugly is better than not winning at all, as this round 2 tournament game shows. I hadn't won a game in a while, after a frankly miserable previous tournament, so I took what I could get here. The opening was a solid success, in response to my opponent's early deviation from theory. My Slav formation as Black was fine, but I missed opportunities for more active piece play, including misplaying things with my light-square bishop. My opponent got some pressure and both of us missed a winning "removal of the guard" tactic in the early endgame. However, after that I played much more actively and obtained successful counterplay - enough for equality. I could tell my opponent still wanted very much to win, however, and he ended up over-pressing and blundered while under major time pressure.
While my play had some holes, I'll give myself credit for mental toughness after blundering and almost losing, to then up my level of play and press back against my opponent in a correct assessment of the position. Had he accepted that it was a draw, he wouldn't have lost, but the over-pressing phenomenon is one way I've beaten a number of higher-rated players over the years.
23 February 2026
Annotated Game #335: All rook endgames *should* be drawn
This first-round tournament game was a useful experience with the reverse London System formation, which my opponent plays into as Black. As White, I could have played a little more aggressively with 4. Qb3!? but had a normal and very equal position heading into the middlegame. My opponent does a very good job with the transitions from middlegame to multiple endgame phases, seizing the opportunity to punish poor endgame decisions on piece placement. That said, the rook endgame *should* have been drawn...