This fourth-round tournament game features an extended period of middlegame maneuvering, which is a feature of some English Opening variations in which neither side has obvious weaknesses; a head-on attack would simply hand the advantage to your opponent. Black early on inflicts some positional and structural weaknesses on himself, including weakening his dark-square complex and locking his light-square bishop away. White's choice of non-confrontational opening variation means that he ends up with a positional edge, but no obvious way to immediately punish Black.
In the middlegame, White's incorrect choice of strategy with 12. b4 leads him nowhere in particular, although Black continues an to make some positionally weakening moves. White starts to go astray with his awkward move 22, essentially ceding the initiative - at least mentally - to Black. A remarkable tactical idea for White on move 27 (and afterwards) is completely missed by both sides, which if the engines had a sense of humor would no doubt very much amuse them. After a good deal of back-and-forth, Black's attempt to press White comes to naught and a draw is a agreed, with neither side seeing how to make progress. It's worth noting that Black was rated around 100 points higher than I was, which I think weighed on my decision-making process and made me more inclined to look for a draw and pass up other opportunities. With more
mental toughness that wouldn't have happened.
Key points that can be drawn from this game:
- Applying the plan of pushing the b-pawn, which is common in other variations, was not called for here. Playing an opening on automatic and not critically evaluating different positions can lead to ineffectual play.
- It is important to look for central pawn breaks and exchanges in the English. The play here was typical of my past refusal to consider these types of moves, which I wrongly felt were uncharacteristic of the opening.
- Similarly, I failed to consider key alternatives on move 25 and 26 which would have been superior and probably winning. This was symptomatic of my failure to look for tactical options in many situations, as these did not fit with my self-imposed mental image of having a "positional style" as a player.
The last point on how my self-perceived playing style held me back is, I think, a common and major psychological flaw among amateur players. More on this later.
1.e4 | 1,161,232 | 54% | 2421 | --- |
1.d4 | 943,611 | 55% | 2434 | --- |
1.Nf3 | 280,295 | 56% | 2441 | --- |
1.c4 | 181,395 | 56% | 2442 | --- |
1.g3 | 19,649 | 56% | 2427 | --- |
1.b3 | 14,142 | 54% | 2427 | --- |
1.f4 | 5,868 | 48% | 2376 | --- |
1.Nc3 | 3,749 | 51% | 2385 | --- |
1.b4 | 1,735 | 48% | 2378 | --- |
1.a3 | 1,187 | 53% | 2403 | --- |
1.e3 | 1,063 | 48% | 2408 | --- |
1.d3 | 940 | 50% | 2378 | --- |
1.g4 | 658 | 46% | 2359 | --- |
1.h4 | 441 | 52% | 2372 | --- |
1.c3 | 419 | 51% | 2423 | --- |
1.h3 | 277 | 56% | 2416 | --- |
1.a4 | 106 | 59% | 2469 | --- |
1.Nh3 | 88 | 66% | 2510 | --- |
1.f3 | 87 | 45% | 2429 | --- |
1.Na3 | 40 | 63% | 2477 | --- |
Please, wait...
1.c4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.g3 Nf6 4.Bg2 g6 5.b3 Bg7 6.Bb2 0-0 7.Qc2 Nbd7 8.0-0 Re8 8...c6 9.Rd1 Re8 10.d4 Ne4 11.Nbd2 Nxd2 12.Rxd2 b6 13.e4 Bb7 14.Re1 Rc8 15.Ne5 Nf6 16.f3 Qc7 17.Nd3 Nd7 18.cxd5 cxd5 19.Qxc7 Rxc7 20.e5 9.Re1 9.Nc3 9...c6 10.d3 Qc7 10...e5!?= 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Nc3 a6 11.Nbd2 b6 12.b4 12.cxd5 exd5 13.e4 Bb7 13...dxe4 14.dxe4 14.e5 Ng4 15.d4 c5 16.Bh3 12.Rac1 12...Bb7 13.a4 dxc4 13...a5 14.bxa5 Rxa5 14.Qxc4 Rac8 15.Rac1 15.Qc3!? 15...e5 16.Ng5 Re7 17.Nb3 17.Nde4 h6 18.Nxf6+ Nxf6 19.Ne4 Nxe4 20.Bxe4 17.Ba3 17...h6 18.Ne4 Qb8 19.Nxf6+ Bxf6 20.Qc2 20.a5 c5 21.Bxb7 Qxb7 22.bxc5 Nxc5 23.axb6 axb6 24.Ba3 20...Qd6 20...c5 21.Bxb7 Qxb7 22.Nd2= 21.Qd2 21.Nd2 Bg7 22.a5 Ree8 23.Nc4 Qc7 24.axb6 axb6 25.Ra1 21...Qe6 22.Rc3?! 22.Qc2 22...Kg7 23.Rec1 Nb8 24.a5 24.d4 24...e4 24...Na6 25.d4 Rd8 26.Re3 25.d4 25.dxe4 Bxc3 26.Qxc3+ f6± 27.Bh3 Qf7 28.Bxc8 Bxc8 25...Rd7 25...Qd5 26.f3 Bg5 27.f4= 26.e3 26.Re3± 26...Be7?? 26...Na6!? 27.b5 Nb4= 27.Rc4 27.d5 Rxd5 28.Rxc6+ Kg8 29.Qc3 Bf6 30.Rxc8+ Bxc8 31.Qxf6 Qxf6 32.Bxf6 27...f6 28.Ba3 28.d5!? Rxd5 29.Nd4 Qg4 30.h3 Qd7 31.Bxe4 28...Ba6 29.R4c3 Qd5 30.Qb2 Bb5 31.Nd2 f5 32.f3 exf3 33.Nxf3 33.Bxf3 Qf7 34.Nc4 33...Qe6? 33...Rdd8 34.Ne5?! 34.d5! Qf6 35.Nd4 bxa5 36.Nxb5 axb4 37.dxc6 bxc3 38.cxd7 Nxd7 39.Rxc3 Rxc3 40.Nxc3+- 34...Rdc7 35.axb6 35.Nxc6!? Nxc6 36.Bxc6 35...axb6 36.Kf2= 36.Nxc6 36.Qd2 36...Bf6 37.Nc4 Bxc4 38.Rxc4 b5 39.R4c2 Re8 39...Nd7 40.Re1 40.Rc3 40...Bg5? 41.Rce2 41.d5+ Qf6 42.dxc6+- 41...Qd6 42.Qc3 Rce7 42...Nd7 43.Bb2 Bf6 44.Qd2 44.Ra1!? ½–½
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
ChessAdmin | - | Class B | - | ½–½ | A13 | |
Please, wait...
A very interesting game.
ReplyDeleteI thought you were pretty much better at 18...Qb8 so maybe b4 was OK.
It doesn't look like Black has a whole lot and there are some good targets like the hanging R on e7, possible pin of Nd7, and the pin on f7 which weakens g6.
Also d6 looks good for a N and if exchanging the B on b7 then c8 looks like trouble for Black.
I'm not sure what my plan would be but I'm thinking there might be time to reposition something like Nbd2, Qb3 and then Nc4 might offer some good opportunities.
Thanks for the comments. I don't think 12. b4 was a bad move necessarily, but it didn't really do much for White and was symptomatic of a rather weak analysis of the position and resulting planning during the game (i.e. "I'll play b4 because that's what I always play in the English.")
ReplyDelete18...Qb8 definitely put Black in a weaker position. I particularly like the analysis variation for White on move 21 (Nd2).