This fourth-round tournament game has a more satisfying feel to it than the previous
"ratings draw" where I (as White) should have made the necessary effort to win the endgame, regardless of the ratings gap. Here, as Black I am unable to play my usual ...Bf5 in response to a Colle System setup because White plays an early Bd3 - probably with preventing that move in mind. However, opening theory and practice exists for a reason and a drawback of the unusual early bishop move is quickly demonstrated by Black, who exchanges off the d-pawn and then pressures its replacement. The opening - which seems to be a strange mix of Colle and Stonewall Attack ideas - doesn't lose for White, but he quickly abandons any chance of an advantage while giving himself some positional flaws, so it has to be considered a bust.
By move 9 Black has the game fully in hand and White is struggling to come up with good ideas, although the position is still balanced. Black never loses his grip and then steers the game towards a drawn ending, although the alternatives shown around move 19-20 would have allowed him to keep pressuring White in the hopes of realizing his positional advantage. Given the 250-point ratings gap and Black's lack of a clearly winning advantage, I think a draw was a reasonable result, although it would have been useful to probe harder in the middlegame, as White had no real counter-threats.
This was an encouraging game from the improvement standpoint, as it was blunder-free and I essentially dominated things strategically from early in the opening phase against a much higher-rated opponent, even though the advantage obtained was not sufficient for a win. In more general terms, games like these should be encouraging for us Class B players, as they help show that Class A players should not be feared.
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.d4 d5 2.e3 Nf6 3.Bd3 c5 4.b3 cxd4 4...Nc6 5.Bb2 Bg4 6.Nf3 e6 7.h3 Bxf3 8.Qxf3 cxd4 9.Bxd4 e5 10.Bc3 e4 11.Bxf6 gxf6 12.Bxe4 dxe4 13.Qxe4+ Qe7 14.Qxe7+ Bxe7 5.exd4 Nc6 6.Ne2 Bg4 7.f3 Bh5 8.0-0 e6 9.Be3 Bd6 10.Qe1 10.c4 dxc4 10...e5!? 11.Nbc3 e4 12.fxe4?! 12.Bc2 exf3 13.gxf3 Bg6 12...Bxh2+ 13.Kh1 13.Kxh2? Ng4+ 11.bxc4 Bg6= 10...Qc7 10...Bg6!? 10...Rc8 11.Kh1 11.Qh4!? 11...Bg6 11...Bxh2? 12.g3± 12.a3 Bxd3 13.cxd3 Rc8 14.Nbc3 a6 15.b4 0-0 15...Bxh2 16.g3 Bxg3 17.Nxg3 Nxb4 18.axb4 Qxc3 19.Qb1 16.Rc1 b5 17.Bd2 Qb8 18.Na2 Rfe8 19.Qf2 Ne7 19...h6 20.Qg1 20.Bg5 Nd7 21.Bxe7 Bxe7 20...Rxc1 20...Nf5 21.Rxc1 Rc8 22.g3 Rxc1 23.Qxc1 Qc7 23...Nd7!?= 24.Qxc7= Bxc7 25.Nac1 Nc6 26.Nb3 Nd7 27.Kg2 Kf8 28.Kf2 Ke7 29.h3 Ndb8 30.Bf4 Bxf4 31.Nxf4 Nd7 32.Ke3 Nb6 33.Nc5 a5 34.bxa5 Nxa5 35.Ne2 Nc6 36.Kd2 Kd6 37.Nb7+ Kc7 38.Nc5 Kd6 ½–½
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Class A | - | ChessAdmin | - | ½–½ | D00 | |
Please, wait...
A solid game, but I think you should fight a little more in those strategically superior positions : the class A players aren't going to hang a full piece... :-)
ReplyDeleteI completely agree, especially when there's no risk to your own position. 19...h6 followed by 20...Nf5 would have been the way to go.
DeleteHi CA,
ReplyDeleteNice game, you're right about ignoring ratings. If this opponent was an "A" he must've been in a coma. After 14. Nbc3 it looks he has something like 4 hanging pieces. Not many good players allow that.
It looks like you have a decent chance for a win after 22.g3. The key after getting a winning position is invasion. Since you control the c-file, that looks like the easiest entry. Maybe 22..Rxc1 wasn't so good. Let him exchange and keep control. Maybe 22. Rc7 if 23. Rxc7 Qxc7 probably forces 24. Qc1 with the exchange and tempo then you can work on the doubled pawns for the win with maybe ..Nf5 then ..Bc7 threatening d4 and a5 weakening a3. That d4 pawn is important though because with the N's on the board c5 square is a real concern.
Exchanging down as done in the game was definitely the wrong idea, albeit a safe one. After the game continuation the engines rate the position equal as of move 24 and I would agree with that, there's not enough material left on the board to exploit White's weaknesses and that c5 square is a weakness in Black's camp. I'm more savvy now (I hope) about the real effects of exchanging pieces, i.e. it's not always a path to realizing an existing advantage, if you can no longer exploit it afterwards.
DeleteHi Chess Admin, you're right, after 24... it is probably equal but you might not want to rely on the machine to analyze for you. It looks like White equalizes because of the tempo lost on 24...Bxc7 and the white B still on d2. With my line white must take a lot of time to get the N to c5 because the B is on c1 which also weakens a5. With tempo White's frozen doubled pawn's look to make Black better.
ReplyDeleteExchanging for tempo is a huge advantage, I remember Nimzovich stresses it in one of his classics.